CARLANDER (MARMATON), District 10, Texas
A field is the Railroad Commission's unit of geology and of regulation. Its spacing rule is what decides how many wells an acreage can hold.
Our estimate: volumes the operator filed with the Commission, valued at the EIA first-purchase price for that month. It is not a payment anyone received, and it is not a royalty. It sums the 8 leases in this field that have a page here — 89% of the register's 9 — so it understates the field.
Production, 2025
The Railroad Commission's Oil and Gas Annual Report for 2025, its most recent. These are the state's figures for the whole field, not ours.
| Wells | In the field | Producing | Produced in 2025 | Also produced | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil | 8 | 0 | 0 bbl | 0 mcfcasinghead | 1,867,785 bblsince discovery |
| Gas | 1 | 1 | 9,058 mcf | 3,884 bblcondensate | 57,082 mcfsince 1970 |
The discovery well's oil measured 39.0° API gravity, perforated at 4,864 ft.
Spacing rule
What the Commission requires of a well on this field.
| Wells | Rule | Effective | From the lease line | Between wells | Acres per unit | Max diagonal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil | B | 1988-04-01 | 660 ft | 1,320 ft | 160 | 4,500 ft |
| Oil | O | 1988-04-01 | 660 ft | 1,320 ft | 80 | 3,250 ft |
Commission remarks: OPTIONAL 80 ACRES W/3250 DIAGONAL
County
Leases in this field
Every lease here files this field's number with the Commission and has a page on this site.
| Lease | Operator | Value |
|---|---|---|
| BUSH | BURK ROYALTY CO., LTD. | $5.2 M |
| BUSH "A" | BURK ROYALTY CO., LTD. | $2.2 M |
| CARLANDER | BURK ROYALTY CO., LTD. | $1.6 M |
| CARLANDER | BURK ROYALTY CO., LTD. | $1.5 M |
| BUSH -C- | CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY | $1.5 M |
| LUNDBERG | CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY | $1.0 M |
| BUSH -B- | BURK ROYALTY CO., LTD. | $593 k |
| CARLANDER "A" | PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY | $313 k |
Field number 15668500, from the Railroad Commission's field register. The register's own index resolves 9 leases and 18 wells to this field by name, over every lease in Texas rather than only those with a page here. It resolves a lease by NAME and refuses an ambiguous one, so it counts nothing for a field that shares its name with another — which is why the lease count above comes from the field number instead.