DIXIELAND (ATOKA, U.), District 08, Texas
A field is the Railroad Commission's unit of geology and of regulation. Its spacing rule is what decides how many wells an acreage can hold.
Our estimate: volumes the operator filed with the Commission, valued at the EIA first-purchase price for that month. It is not a payment anyone received, and it is not a royalty. It sums the 8 leases in this field that have a page here — 67% of the register's 12 — so it understates the field.
Production, 2025
The Railroad Commission's Oil and Gas Annual Report for 2025, its most recent. These are the state's figures for the whole field, not ours.
| Wells | In the field | Producing | Produced in 2025 | Also produced | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil | 1 | 0 | 0 bbl | 0 mcfcasinghead | 0 bblsince discovery |
| Gas | 5 | 1 | 852,894 mcf | 0 bblcondensate | 111,627,912 mcfsince 1970 |
The discovery well's oil measured 35.0° API gravity, perforated at 5,113 ft.
Spacing rule
What the Commission requires of a well on this field.
| Wells | Rule | Effective | From the lease line | Between wells | Acres per unit | Max diagonal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gas | B | 1999-01-12 | 1,320 ft | 2,640 ft | 640 | 12,500 ft |
Commission remarks: AND AOF-2 FORMS
County
Leases in this field
Every lease here files this field's number with the Commission and has a page on this site.
| Lease | Operator | Value |
|---|---|---|
| DIXIELAND 10 | COTERRA ENERGY OPERATING CO. | $182.4 M |
| STATE 71 | CRESCENT ENERGY OPERATING, LLC | $103.8 M |
| APPLETON | COTERRA ENERGY OPERATING CO. | $47.2 M |
| DIXIELAND 10 | CIMAREX ENERGY CO. | $35.3 M |
| SIEVERS | CIMAREX ENERGY CO. | $2.0 M |
| DARCY STATE | COTERRA ENERGY OPERATING CO. | $738 k |
| DIXIELAND | CIMAREX ENERGY CO. | $430 k |
| HARRISON STATE | RESOLUTE NATURAL RES. CO., LLC | $126 k |
Field number 25020250, from the Railroad Commission's field register. The register's own index resolves 12 leases and 12 wells to this field by name, over every lease in Texas rather than only those with a page here. It resolves a lease by NAME and refuses an ambiguous one, so it counts nothing for a field that shares its name with another — which is why the lease count above comes from the field number instead.