ROY BLAKE (MISS), District 09, Texas
A field is the Railroad Commission's unit of geology and of regulation. Its spacing rule is what decides how many wells an acreage can hold.
Our estimate: volumes the operator filed with the Commission, valued at the EIA first-purchase price for that month. It is not a payment anyone received, and it is not a royalty. It sums the 6 leases in this field that have a page here — 75% of the register's 8 — so it understates the field.
Production, 2025
The Railroad Commission's Oil and Gas Annual Report for 2025, its most recent. These are the state's figures for the whole field, not ours.
| Wells | In the field | Producing | Produced in 2025 | Also produced | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil | 2 | 0 | 179 bbl | 1,220 mcfcasinghead | 281,215 bblsince discovery |
The discovery well's oil measured 44.0° API gravity, perforated at 5,015 ft.
Spacing rule
What the Commission requires of a well on this field.
County
Leases in this field
Every lease here files this field's number with the Commission and has a page on this site.
| Lease | Operator | Value |
|---|---|---|
| BOYDSTON | RAINWATER, JOHN | $1.0 M |
| ALLAR | MAYO, EDDIE | $277 k |
| CROSSROADS | WALTON PRODUCING COMPANY | $21 k |
| TAYLOR | DUNCAN LAND & EXPLORATION, INC. | $14 k |
| CASTEEL | RED-TEX PETROLEUM, INC. | $4 k |
| PETTY | BOYDSTON & MOORE | $1 k |
Field number 78763500, from the Railroad Commission's field register. The register's own index resolves 8 leases and 11 wells to this field by name, over every lease in Texas rather than only those with a page here. It resolves a lease by NAME and refuses an ambiguous one, so it counts nothing for a field that shares its name with another — which is why the lease count above comes from the field number instead.