SANER RANCH (SAN MIGUEL), District 01, Texas
A field is the Railroad Commission's unit of geology and of regulation. Its spacing rule is what decides how many wells an acreage can hold.
Our estimate: volumes the operator filed with the Commission, valued at the EIA first-purchase price for that month. It is not a payment anyone received, and it is not a royalty. It sums the 5 leases in this field that have a page here — 29% of the register's 17 — so it understates the field.
Production, 2025
The Railroad Commission's Oil and Gas Annual Report for 2025, its most recent. These are the state's figures for the whole field, not ours.
| Wells | In the field | Producing | Produced in 2025 | Also produced | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil | 2 | 1 | 21 bbl | 0 mcfcasinghead | 420,859 bblsince discovery |
| Gas | 0 | 0 | 0 mcf | 0 bblcondensate | 1,362,040 mcfsince 1970 |
The discovery well's oil measured 10.0° API gravity, perforated at 1,460 ft.
Spacing rule
What the Commission requires of a well on this field.
| Wells | Rule | Effective | From the lease line | Between wells | Acres per unit | Max diagonal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gas | B | 2008-04-08 | 165 ft | 330 ft | 5 | 1,000 ft |
| Gas | O | 2008-04-08 | 165 ft | 330 ft | 3 | 600 ft |
| Oil | B | 2008-04-08 | 165 ft | 330 ft | 5 | 1,000 ft |
| Oil | O | 2008-04-08 | 165 ft | 330 ft | 3 | 600 ft |
Commission remarks: 600' DIAGONAL.
County
Leases in this field
Every lease here files this field's number with the Commission and has a page on this site.
| Lease | Operator | Value |
|---|---|---|
| CHITTIM | NEWFIELD MAVERICK BASIN LLC | $378 k |
| RAMBIE, ROBERT | SPARTAN OPERATING COMPANY, INC. | $216 k |
| CHITTIM "B" | NEWFIELD MAVERICK BASIN LLC | $66 k |
| WAUKESHA-PEARCE | KREMCO OIL LLC | $48 k |
| MOSTYN | PETROSAND ENERGY, INC. | $9 k |
Field number 80714500, from the Railroad Commission's field register. The register's own index resolves 17 leases and 80 wells to this field by name, over every lease in Texas rather than only those with a page here. It resolves a lease by NAME and refuses an ambiguous one, so it counts nothing for a field that shares its name with another — which is why the lease count above comes from the field number instead.